Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 749.

The website will be under maintenance this weekend (May 25st - May 27th), starting around 18:00 CET
During this time, the forum will be unavailable and downloading the rules will not be possible.
Though we will proceed as fast as possible, we are not sure yet how long the forum will remain out of reach. We might push info on Twitter if it takes more time than expected.

  • See that is the exact thing I am talking about. If you really like the concept you would find points elsewhere to compensate. What you were linking (based on your response) was the potential mechanical effectiveness of the concept, not the concept behind it.

  • Scent of Blood

    Giladis - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Little. It is a mostly negative rule to maintain the flavour of the unit.

  • Considering one was a complete switch of an army I somehow doubt that was the motivation. If someone liked the concept 180 pts overall should not make much of a difference whether something is taken or not.

  • I would like to add circumstantial evidence that the correct price for TB lies somewhere between 204.1 and 204.0 by the example the event I am going to this weekend suddenly got two SE armies with 18 TB when the TO announced 204.0 instead of 204.1 would be used. Which means we are probably close to a correct price, we just need an iteration or two to get it right.

  • And the lists are in

  • @DeBelial @Krokz that is something different to just giving the current guys a set of mutations. The post I was replying to did not indicate there would be any change to the chassis to accommodate these upgrades.

  • I can answer the small price reductions question right here if you do not want to waste the slot. The BLT is being careful in reducing the cost of units trying not to over shoot. Preferring several smaller steps to reach the right price over one big one that risks turning a piece that isn't played often into a must have.

  • Giving them such upgrades would make them potentially more elite or as elite as the Chosen which is not wanted. They are allowed to be equally point efficient but not to be as elite stat and rules wise.

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Giladis - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from KiRaHyuU: “4. Why do the pts of Blades of Nabh continue to be so high despite other frenzy infantry units only dropping DS1 and Blades dropped DS2? ” Blades are not the only unit that dropped by 2 Quote from umbranar: “Can someone who plays the army join BLT please? ” One of the most active BLT members took DE to WTC just last month. So I doubt the army is "misunderstood".

  • There is no price limit on Banners for a while now

  • Quote from Evaenarion: “Quote from Giladis: “Why not total combo of Dorac, Forstie and Divination? Getting hit on 6 more often than not. ” if somebody from game creators is seriously worried about this, then HbE are really doomed ” What made you think I was worried?

  • Not possible because two of those chaffing units are cavalry and cavalry playstyle is meant for HE. Protect the castle is meant to be one of the sub styles of HE simply because of the rules and units available on the roster while taking into account stats and mechanics. Also since DE already cover agressive elves HE should not step on their toes. The RT feels the players would not like what would be seen as necessary reduction to ranged capabilities in order to fascilitate more agressive lists. …

  • Let's Fix the Unicorn

    Giladis - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from landonelf: “But maybe this thread can serve as a way to bounce around ideas for long term eventual updates? ”

  • Why not total combo of Dorac, Forstie and Divination? Getting hit on 6 more often than not.

  • Let's Fix the Unicorn

    Giladis - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Let me dispel the notion that a Unicorn will see major changes in design before the Full Book creation process. The entry just went through a redesign and the new design is not dysfunctional so the only thing that might happen before FAB is points adjustment

  • Quote from infamousme: “One might say that they'd be the core of my force. ” Please check the rulebook for explanation what each category represents. Special units can just as much form the "core" of the army without being a Core unit

  • No more copyright paranoia

    Giladis - - General Discussion

    Post

    Even if GW wouldn't send a CD letter the Project has no intention to partake in illegal activities or create our products in a manner that would give third parties power over it,

  • @Borjnfer Wraith not really advisable for tournament play, especially in events where usage of models is mandatory.

  • Quote from Borjnfer Wraith: “Quote from Giladis: “For my Dragon list RC more than just viable they are crucial as they can deflect challenges allowing the Dragon to inflict serious damage and there aren't many opponents outside character capable of tanking a chariot. Champions due to IH are outside few special cases dead meat. ” Shhhhhhh, do you want the rules team to hear how good they are?! You know full well what happens to our stuff when they hear about it. ” Take a look at my sig

  • Characters builds v. 201

    Giladis - - Sylvan Elves (SE)

    Post

    Quote from nantuko: “Quote from Giladis: “Did anyone have any luck with WH Whirlwind Black Stag Prince with WH BSB in a WH sledgehammer? ” I tried several combinations of WH characters and they are always disappointing imho. Not tried the combination you mention but I find all of them subpar ” Subpar for what tasks? 9S6 Ap3 Battle Focus Lethal Strike Os8 Ignore Parry is one hell of a blender in my opinion. Bit light on defence but hits like a train.