Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Fixing Tuskers

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from Werepire: “If the loner fluff of hunters prevents this than khans or great khans should be allowed to take a tusker. ” Could this be a big name instead of just being able to ride tuskers? I imagine there is a good reason you cant join a tusker unit with your khan and great khan to create some ultra deathstar. Quote from Jocker: “Does anyone believe that they are going to fix them? Or pray? Because we still have the Veteran Mercenaries to fix xD ” Melee mercs are a known issue and are …

  • Hunter mounts?

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Following this thread, keep ideas rolling. Wesser is sadly pretty accurate in what he said with no poison immunity or 3 aurochs. Would extra weapon options be a usable fix for tusker hunters? Currently only ironfist sees play due to giving that extra armour but what if they could still use the +1 armour that is only available to hunters on foot currently? They would still be limited to 2+ (ironfist on foot as it's a really bad mounted weapon) but they could use weapons like GW, lances, etc. P.S.…

  • Fixing Tuskers

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from MxM: “Quote from Jomppexx: “Paired weapons have currently been submitted as something the OK community is interested in and they are in the workings. ” Good to know . Any idea when the next update will be (just indicatively)? Quote from Jomppexx: “remember to go vote on the poll concerning liked and disliked names, this way you can have an impact on the kind of names you want to see more of! ” Already done ” Not sure but it's coming.

  • Fixing Tuskers

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Paired weapons have currently been submitted as something the OK community is interested in and they are in the workings. While you wait for the new update remember to go vote on the poll concerning liked and disliked names, this way you can have an impact on the kind of names you want to see more of! Link to poll: OK - Background Team Poll for liked names

  • Quote from Nicklz: “Quote from Damo: “On the question is it realistic that small manuverable units can speed bump a big strong unit? Historically i think so. Theres a youtube channel that recounts historical battles m.youtube.com/channel/UCx-dJoP9hFCBloY9qodykvw that displays it in familiar patterns to us. ” You sir made my weeken! It is awesome this channel exists and I shall bingewatch it over easter! ” Very cool channel I agree. Interesting stuff!

  • Quote from Glonojad: “I don't want to excuse anyone, but it seems that long works times and some difficulties in communication are a staple for all those indie companies that one cater to our addiction (aka hobby)... came to accept it, even if a bit grudgingly. In the long run, most of them are still just guys like us, crafting small to medium scale produced goodies in garages, usually selling directly - not pumping them out of Chinese factories sellng through Amazon logistics. ” Yes but people …

  • Lance option would be great!

  • What a glorious picture.

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from jacobkjellerup: “Quote from Jocker: “The key to the Ogre Khans... is WildHeart. But I think it needs some Magic, or shot to clean enemy chaff. What is your opinion? I think the meta, are very big units. And I doubt if to take a Scratapult... ” I am curious why you think so? Wild heart seems strong now, but only because: Bombadiers, Mercenaries and to some degree Bruisers seem weak. Not because Wildheart brings something special to the table. My frustration with Wildheart is I have to …

  • OK General chat

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from MichaeliusMaximus: “So, which lores do you guys use on your shaman masters? I have been a shamanism guy for most of the 9th age so far, but i am seeing a lot of thauma/pyro lists around. I have not been able to test those 2 yet. So, which lore and why? ” Thaumaturgy for the reasons Lagerlof pointed out. Shamanism also doesn't seem bad. Pyromancy looks to be the last choice out of the three.

  • Ogre Khans WTC Herford Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Interestingly some lists ran big bruiser units.

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from thedoctor: “i think sabre-tusks would be much more viable as more than 80 point re-directors if they had some sort of rule basically giving them a musician or if they would count as scoring if taken in 8+ ” WDG wolves are core once you take at least 8. I think with sabretusks something like 4 or 5 could even count as core.

  • Yes 2+ armour. Combining black steel and dusk forged is fine as dusk forged is a shield enchantment and black steel goes on your armour.

  • Quote from Traumdieb: “As far as I understand the bearer of the crown of the wizard king becomes a wizard and can therefor take a wizard only item. Correct? ” Correct.

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    What kind of changes would you have in mind? I'm currently playing a wild heart list and I'd call it pretty flexible/mobile with my bsb being able to move 14" with light troops and general 16" without light troops to bring leadership where it is needed.

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Rock Aurochs are still pretty good in my opinion. They fill their role of crushing stuff on the charge. I do agree they were probably overnerfed. I would've suggested removing hellfist and stubborn and be done with it. I don't think it would've been too powerful. Maybe drop Rock Aurochs discipline to 7 so you have to play closer to your general. Front rank definitely hurts ogres. No more can the shaman hide easily. Impact hits now get +1 if the ogre unit has at least 2 full ranks but I agree the…

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from youngseward: “Quote from Ciara: “Yep, you are totally right. No one is playing bh at the one of italian masters and no one is making problem out of it. If there is problem with ogres, could you elaborate what could it be? ” Plenty of people on the BH forums are viewing that as a sign of a big problem actually ” It definitely can be seen as a big problem. This was a team tournament so maybe other armies can just fill the slot ogres would take but more effectively? I don't know. I haven…

  • OK General chat

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    I think diagonal is either very good for ambushing (shooting enemy) or terrible for ambushing if the enemy is playing an aggressive army. Some others most likely have pros and cons as well. With your aggressive army ambushing is a pretty good idea as you can in a way attack the opponent from both sides if they don't push up and come meet you in the field.

  • Ogre Khans LBM Lists

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    Quote from Ciara: “There is no problem with ogres. There were problem with ogres when they had hellfist. ” Agreed. I think Ogres currently can build pretty powerful and effective armies, even if they aren't as insane as before.

  • OK General chat

    Jomppexx - - Ogre Khans (OK)

    Post

    I played against very aggressive VC and I ambushed the other and deployed one normally. The ambushing one came on my deployment zone so probably would've been better to just not ambush. Depends on your opponent whether to ambush or not. Coming on the field suddenly from a flank or rear can be beneficial even against more aggressive minded opponents. Also deployment type makes a big difference. In my opinion ambush is not as good in certain deployment types either.