Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 284.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

The latest issue of the 9th Scroll is here! You can read all about it in the news.

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    etc lists ETC lists

  • Underused units

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    fighty characters on foot - a general problem of poor protection and mobility cult priest on foot - uninteresting unfluffy special rule dragons - again a general problem; those units need a complete overhaul across all armybooks that have them corsairs - a unit without an actual purpose/distinctive role auxilliaries - a static unit that has no place in an army based on mobility dark raiders - prohibited in full cult armies medusa - petryfing stare needs an overhaul hydra - overpriced

  • How much is too much?

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    I would start with a block of spearmen 25-30) and another one of Dancers of Yema. Those two units are very effective. Support it with dark raiders, bolt throwers and the altar and you have a nice starter. Remember to field bolt throwers properly so you wouldn't block their line of sight with your own units and protect them against opponent's fastest troops at the same time.

  • Quote from Emgies: “Quote from Masamune88: “Quote from Riismanden: “@DanT just wanted to let you know that it is fantastic that you take the time to answer so many questions. I have in the last few pages gained a lot more knowledge astound thoughts and reasons behind designs. Thank you! ” I second the above, we are a finicky beast at the best of times and quite hard to engage, the fact that you still are willing to come half way is astounding, hats off to you sir ” The word goes @DanT went on "v…

  • Cannons don't have +1 to hit against Gigantic anymore if the latter is in cover. Do you think it is time to dust off our dragons?

  • The top performing list at the WTC had 2 hydras and 4 raptor chariots. Maybe that's why they both went up in price.

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from KiRaHyuU: “Quote from Stevone13: “Where can i find the new beta !? ” It's not officially out yet as there are also point changes that the spoilers left out.... Maybe end of the week? You know these things....always subject to change ” The release is today. It's already been announced in the news section.

  • speaking of mistakes - acolytes do not have vanguard

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    If TK is right so far he has played HE, 3xVC, WDG and KoE. Won all 20:0.

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    lists from Chicago GT dropbox.com/sh/hv46r4c1tlf5r3u…fTQ-E0x9RzwvuJCoXK2a?dl=0 5 DE players 4 Hunting Chariots used. Maybe they're not so bad after all

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    Quote from noir: “Quote from Klaudel: “18" QtF RxB on RA would be better than the current version. the unit would become more mobile and thus more useful for our preferred style. ” Im afraid only slapping qtf on them won’t do the job.. ” Well we have tot remember that the weapon is used als by RCs and DRs. The idea is to make it viable (but not too strong) for all of them. 18" QTF is a good option for all 3 of them. If we want to further improve RA I would think of giving them some special rules…

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    18" QtF RxB on RA would be better than the current version. the unit would become more mobile and thus more useful for our preferred style.

  • It would be nice to just add +1 path to each army. So armies with access to 3 path would have 4, those with 4 would have 5 etc. Would increase rosters' variety.

  • For everybody complaining about the power level of Hereditary - just compare it to Unerring Strike. And bound spells are only 2d3 hits. Nothing broken here imo.

  • Guys, please be civil. No need to call people names or troll (even about trolls ). Regards The Mod Team

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    lists for Herford dropbox.com/s/pesmdghjkjj8zir/…rs%20short%200.1.pdf?dl=0

  • Dread Elves 2.0 Beta Armybook

    Klaudel - - Dread Elves (DE)

    Post

    At least we have something to discuss (and test) after the 25 pts drop of price. Having said that I also agree that DS3 would look more elegant on them.

  • Imo it's perfectly doable. Paths are balanced so no OP combos will occur. Background will have more work to do than BLT in this case. C'mon 3 paths for an army is just so limiting!

  • ...as in the title. Armies that have access to 3 paths would have 4, that that have 4 would have 5 etc. It would create more content, more options and in no away harm external balance.

  • Medusa - as the anti-steadfast rule just doesn't work (anyone used it already btw?) Black Dragon - as we really need those beasts back. Other entries (esp our infantry) should wait for the full redesign imo. Quote from Klaudel: “@noir if it's not a secret could you tell us the names of our new ADT members? ” And what about this, darling? I've already started thinking you're having an affair :p